UDC 327(470.661)
Biblid: 0025-8555, 63(2011)
Vol. 63, No 4, pp. 583-612
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1104583J
Оriginal article
Received: 15 Oct 2011
Accepted: 15 Nov 2011
NAGORNO KARABAKH PROBLEM IN THE LIGHT OF BILATERAL RELATIONS OF OSCE MINSK GROUP MEMBER COUNTRIES
JOVIĆ LAZIĆ Ana (Ana Jović Lazić, istraživač-saradnik, Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd),
anajovic@diplomacy.bg.ac.rs
JELISAVAC TROŠIĆ Sanja (Sanja Jelisavac Trošić, istraživač-saradnik, Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd), sanja@diplomacy. bg.ac.rs
JAZIĆ Aleksandar (Aleksandar Jazić, istraživač-saradnik, Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd), jazic@diplomacy.bg.ac.rs
This paper analyses confrontation that occurred between Armenia and Azerbaijan concerning Nagorno Karabakh territory, as well as the many attempts to finally get this conflict resolved. The war between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the territory of Nagorno Karabakh ended with the ceasefire agreement under the auspices of the OSCE Minsk Group, which is empowered for final resolvment of this issue. This process has been going on for years, but a solution is yet to come. The European Union in recent years is trying to reduce dependence on Russian natural gas and orients to new suppliers, primarily in the southern Caucasus region. Western countries are interested in resolving conflicts in South Caucasus due to its economic and political interests in the region and the fact that these conflicts pose a risk to investment. The authors of the paper will bring forth the views of all stakeholders in addressing the problem of Nagorno Karabakh and analyze their interests in an attempt to predict the possible final solution to the conflict.
Keywords: Nagorno Karabakh, “frozen conflict”, Minsk Group, OSCE, Madrid principles, project Nabucco, South Stream project, European Union, Russian Federation